During a recent episode of The Minimalists podcast, Dr. Paul Saladino shared several views on sunscreen, UV exposure, and skin cancer prevention. Given the controversy surrounding some of his statements, we reviewed the current scientific evidence to determine how well these claims hold up.
Claim 1: Sunscreen doesn't appreciably lower skin cancer incidence—meta-analysis of 300 studies says so.
Refutation:
A widely cited systematic review (2018) encompassing 29 studies with over 300,000 participants found no significant association between sunscreen use and reduced skin cancer risk—pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.91–1.28) for all skin cancers, and similarly inconclusive for melanoma and non-melanoma types (1). However, more recent and higher-quality research paints a different picture:
-
A 2020 review (Sander et al.) highlights that sunscreen does reduce the incidence of both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, and is endorsed by dermatological organizations including the Canadian Dermatology Association and the American Academy of Dermatology (2)
-
A study of sunscreen with SPF ≥15 found a 30% lower risk of melanoma versus lower-SPF users (3)
-
The consensus from global health bodies and recent prospective studies (e.g., Australia’s Nambour trial and large Norwegian cohorts) shows that consistent daily use of broad-spectrum SPF 30+ sunscreen significantly lowers cancer risk (4)
Bottom line: Earlier epidemiological meta-analyses were inconclusive, but more robust, controlled, and long-term research supports sunscreen's protective benefits against skin cancer.
Claim 2: Sunscreen chemicals (e.g., octocrylene, avobenzone, octinoxate, homo-salate) are absorbed, found in urine/feces, and linked to cancers and endocrine disruption.
Refutation:
It’s true that certain chemical UV filters—like oxybenzone and octocrylene—can be absorbed through skin and detected systemically (5). Oxybenzone, in particular, has been implicated in rare allergic reactions and potential hormonal disruption in lab and animal studies. Regulatory agencies (including the FDA and EU) continue evaluating safety, and some places have restricted its use for environmental reasons (5)
However, there is no solid human evidence demonstrating that everyday sunscreen use causes cancer or endocrine disorders. Dermatologists emphasize that no human studies have shown harm—concerns come primarily from animal models or in vitro data, often at unrealistically high doses (4)
Bottom line: While certain sunscreen ingredients raise theoretical concerns, current evidence doesn't support any real-world health risk. Mineral-based options (like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide) offer equally effective protection with minimal absorption.
Claim 3: Melanoma isn’t associated with sun—outdoor workers are protected, skin cancer many occur in sun-protected areas, examples like Bob Marley’s foot.
Refutation:
This is a misunderstanding. Extensive data link ultraviolet (UV) exposure—especially intermittent intense exposure—to melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. (6) Outdoor workers do have a slightly different risk profile: they experience chronic UV, which is more tied to non-melanoma skin cancers. In contrast, intermittent, high-intensity sun exposure or sunburn significantly raises melanoma risk (6)
Also, while melanoma can appear in less sun-exposed areas, that doesn’t mean UV is irrelevant. The bottom of the foot example is anecdotal and not representative of general risk patterns.
Bottom line: UV exposure—especially sunburn—is a major driver of melanoma, even if melanomas sometimes appear in protected locations.
Claim 4: Seed oils (linoleic acid) in the diet increase melanoma risk by accumulating in the skin and making it more sun-sensitive.
Refutation:
This claim is speculative, based mostly on hypotheses and animal or mechanistic studies. Some preliminary research suggests dietary linoleic acid (from seed oils) might influence skin inflammation or UV sensitivity in lab models—but no direct human epidemiological evidence links seed oil intake to higher melanoma or sunburn risk (1).(2) (7)
A cross-sectional analysis (NHANES-like survey) found that sunscreen use—but not shade or clothing—correlated with lower skin cancer prevalence (8). That, however, doesn't support the seed oil theory; it suggests sunscreen’s protective value.
Bottom line: The idea that seed oils increase melanoma risk is unproven in humans and should be regarded as hypothesis, not fact.
Claim 5: Spray sun-screen is unsafe—secondhand inhalation, not fine-chemical free, mineral is better.
Refutation:
Dermatologists caution that aerosol sprays may be less ideal for face protection due to inhalation risks, and indeed inhaling fine particles isn't recommended. Mineral or powder forms are safer for direct application and avoiding respiratory exposure (4).(9)
However, the best protection is a broad-spectrum, SPF 30+ sunscreen applied correctly—whether chemical or mineral. The method of delivery matters less than coverage and reapplication.
Bottom line: Avoid inhaling aerosols—pump or lotion formulations are safer—but mineral or chemical sunscreens both offer effective protection when properly used.
Final Takeaway
While listening to The Minimalists podcast, we heard Dr. Paul Saladino share his views on sunscreen and skin cancer—some aligning with scientific consensus, others challenging it. Intrigued, we broke down his key points and compared them with the latest peer-reviewed research.
Even if we disagree on certain conclusions, we’re grateful he brought these topics forward—conversations like this push us to question assumptions, seek credible sources, and make informed choices about skin health. One thing the evidence makes clear: protecting skin from harmful UV radiation matters, and mineral sunscreens—like our own AELIA—offer an effective, clean, and travel-friendly way to do it. In an era of conflicting health advice, curiosity and critical thinking are your best sun protection.
And if you want to listen to the whole episode, you can do so here.
Works Cited:
(1) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29620003/
(2) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759112/
(3) https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.5874
(4) https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/08/10/anti-sunscreen-movement-risks/
(5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxybenzone
(6) https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/skin-cancer/symptoms-causes/syc-20377605
(7) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_cancer
(8) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9025621/
(9) https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/06/should-we-be-more-worried-about-sunscreen-or-the-sun-itself-suncream-health
